Saturday, December 15, 2012

Perfect Imperfection


What if Christ wasn’t as physically pristine as He frequently portrayed? What if He had a visible, chronic disease? To look at Christ in video portrayals, He was muscular, charismatic, and flawless. While I hold that He was the only physical being to experience mortality without sin, isn’t it a bit much to say that He experienced mortality without physical infirmity? So why do I have such a hard time imagining Christ giving the Sermon on the Mount with a stuffy nose?

The idea of perfection may arise from the mandate that the paschal lamb be “without blemish”. However, that was a physical ordinance foreshadowing a spiritual reality, not necessarily a physical reality.

As far as charisma goes, Isaiah strictly denies that such would be present in the Savior, testifying: “When we shall see him, there is no beauty that we should desire him.” Abinadi adds His testimony to these words, confirming their accurate translation. In other words, there was nothing about His appearance or physical prowess that would have drawn you to Him: He did not rank high on “Hot or Not?” To the contrary, "we did esteem him stricken, smitten of God, and afflicted."

Alma the Younger’s Messianic text describes Christ taking physical infirmities, sicknesses, and pains upon Himself as literally as taking death upon Himself. When Christ revealed Himself to the people of Nazareth, He expected their first response to be “Physician, heal thyself,” possibly indicating some infirmity on His part that His audience would have been aware of and which may have served as a barrier to their belief, if they, like we, were prone to over-value physical appearance, health, and strength. He reported others as critically appraising His physical appearance as that of “a gluttonous man, and a winebibber.”

Did He borrow Simon Peter’s ship to avoid the pain of being seated on the ground? Was the cross carried by Simon of Cyrene because of physical illness at baseline, exacerbated by the exhaustion of Atonement? Was he permitted to sit at meat with Simon the Leper due to leprosy that afflicted Him as well? Was that why lepers felt comfortable asking Him for help? Was that why it required faith for people to touch Him or His clothes?

Sunday, December 9, 2012

Christmas Meanings


Last night we went to Bethlehem in Burnet to hear and see anew the din and wonder that surrounded the Savior’s birth.
We stopped at the reckoning table for taxes, where we reported the many blessings that the Lord has given us. We were asked for payment, as if the punishment should be equal to our blessings, and when we said that we had no money, the tax collector angrily shouted at us and told us to leave before the soldiers could be called to arrest us. Another resident helpfully suggested that although our taxes were high, we might be able to raise funds by selling a child or two. Despite the references throughout the New Testament to abusive taxes, I had never before thought of Joseph, a young provider, likely stripped of his means just prior to his young wife’s great need. Nor had I thought of the anxiety of poverty coloring this young couple’s child-bearing.
I listened to two women arguing “Born in a stable? Doesn’t sound like the kind of place the Messiah would come to me: more like a palace far from here!” The Christmas story can become so route that its mystery is lost. It was bizarre that the God chose this tiny town, a poor neighbor to the sacred Capital, enslaved and abused by invaders, and a miserable stable in that destitute town to host the Heavenly King. Behold the condescension of God! The instinct that the fitting place for Christ is far away is wrong: He is happy to walk into the meanest of circumstances, for the Lord looketh on the heart, and inasmuch as you have done it unto the least of these, my brethren, you have done it unto me.